Page 5 paragraph 4. I agree with this sentiment. The internet has made itself such an important part of everyday life that I would not be able to complete all of my daily tasks without it. As I complete this assignment I am using the internet. There were many words that I had to look up while reading this essay, and I would not have been able to have as solid of an understanding of this article if I didn’t have the internet at my disposal. Sure, I could have gone to the library and checked out a dictionary in order to look up the words I needed clarification on, but using the internet saved me so much time that I was able to finish this assignment. Since the internet has made itself so important in our everyday lives, I definitely feel a sense of gratitude for the ease and comfort it brings to my life, as opposed to much more time consuming and complicated methods of completing tasks.
Page nine, paragraph 2. I disagree with this sentiment. I think this behavior stems from the over-empathy of human beings in general. There are people who feel guilty for moving stuffed animals off of their beds because they think it will hurt their feelings. There are computers that could be so highly advanced, but people wouldn’t give it a second thought if they “hurt” the computer by spilling their drink on it. Humans have an innate urge to feel bad for other living things, so when you give a robot the ability to mimic living traits, then they will, on some level, trigger this empathy. Evolution has nothing to do with it, as this same empathy can be triggered by less evolved creatures. The more human-like something is, the more likely people are to have an emotional response to it. While I understand where the author is coming from, I think that he is setting up a false equivalency between evolution and humans in the context of why humans like more advanced technology
Page 6 paragraph 4: I agree with this idea that Kelly presents. It’s an interesting thought to ponder, how many items we would “lose” if we got rid of the main one, the example he brought was a stove, in which we would lose so many now useless items without it. I very much agree with the idea that manufacturing possibilities are overrunning the planet, and human needs are not expanding at this rate. The amount of useless(ish) items I’ve collected, even at my age, is embarrassing. Especially with platforms such as Shein, Temu, even Amazon, where you can purchase mass amounts of technologies made to make your life easier, but really just clogging up your mental capacity. Having to downsize for college is now a struggle for many, having to bring only the truly useful items with you, having limited space, can be challenging, especially that people form attachments to these useless technologies.
Page 5 paragraph 2: I agree with the idea that Kelly presents, which is technically Turkle’s idea that he includes in his writing. Many of us have our niche, something that makes us slightly unique, builds character, etc. I like the words “springboard for identity.” Not only does it strengthen our own health, mentally and physically, it also brings us closer to others when we relate or debate. Thus more socially aware, etc. The way I interpreted this writing is that we now all have the exact same love; screens/social media. Of course there are many platforms online to relate and debate, but it leaves out the social/physical aspect of it. Someone having aspirations for an online game, eyes 24/7 glued to a screen, and no social interaction, is very different from an athlete with teammates, etc. There is a possibility to have both in a healthy way, the point is that online platforms have drastically taken over. And is that unhealthy? Kelly uses the examples of doctors, writers, dispatcher, and programmers having a love that causes reflection and thinking
Page 1 paragraph 1: I think that this opener is complicated. I agree that teenagers have this severe attachment to phones, seeing it as a branch of themselves that they can not live or be anything without. It is true that many struggle with this. The problem is that parents don’t know how to handle it, or prevent it. Since it’s so new and complicated in ways, this dependency on drug like screens, parents and teenagers alike can’t help themselves. Parents have an influence on their children, their own attachment to screens can have an influence on their behavior. So can other students. I remember being in early middle school, my friends had the latest phones and technology(iphone 8, X, etc) when I was stuck with an ipod. I didn’t understand why they would need all of that access so young, but now it’s more present. Of course now that I’m older and sort of need that technology now, I find myself reaching for the newest products. The opening paragraph overall did its jobs, capturing the reader’s attention and creating thought/reflection.
1. Page 5, paragraph 3
Complicated – I agree with Kelly in the sense that I also view the online world as a “wilderness” that is easy to get lost in, however I feel as though Kelly fails to highlight the scary and isolating sides of the web. My appreciation and love for the online realm could stem from the fact that I have grown up with constant access to technology and its intricacies. I feel as though I can navigate it quite effectively and due to this competence, exploring the online world seems limitless and fun. I find myself frequently going down rabbit holes when I’m online. I enter it without a purpose and see what I can learn, find, and enjoy the entertainment this process evokes. However, I also acknowledge that the online world is also commonly used to provoke fear, spread hate, stimulate polarization, and has the ability to make one feel isolated. This side of online can not be glossed over and users must be cautioned of it before entering it. The online world is a wilderness, however it is also important to remember a wilderness is filled with predators, poisonous plants, and a plethora of other dangers that the explorer must be aware of and prepared for.
2. Page 6, paragraph 4
Agree – I agree and am fascinated by this idea of technologies existing for the sole purpose to serve other technologies. After reading this essay, I became hyperaware of this phenomenon all around me. It’s as if I own several technological ecosystems. Let’s take my phone for example. I have the physical device that is filled with my whole online identity. Yet, I also have a phone case and a glass screen protector to protect this device. In addition, I have multiple chargers with the specific adaptor for my model of iPhone. These accessory items are pieces of technology themselves, however they were created to ensure that my phone can perform as efficiently as possible. In addition, I find it interesting how Kelly states that these systems of interconnected technologies serving each other are incredibly pleasing to humans and is an aspect of this idea of technophilic. Humans love technology not only due to the benefits it provides for them, but also for the aesthetic and existence value of it.
3. Page 10, concluding sentence
Disagree – To conclude this essay Kelly writes, “…technology wants to be loved” (10). I disagree with this statement as I feel there is a clear distinction between humans manifesting human-like characteristics on technology and actually denoting that technology exhibits human emotions, such as love or a desire for it. I do acknowledge that technology evolves to get strangely human-like and we as people are gravitated and entranced by this process. When I contemplate this idea, my mind immediately goes to technologies such as Siri and generative AI. Apple is constantly trying to enhance Siri into responding and sounding more human-like. We can even go on our settings and change its accent to whatever we please. On a separate but similar note, AI applications like ChatGPT are known for their ability to think and act very humanly. I find it so incredibly interesting that we feel emotions towards technology and treat it as if it can possess emotions on its own. For example, I hate to admit that I have felt bad for my devices when they are going to die. I have an emotional response to it being so dwindled of power that that it physically must shut off. However, I really feel there is a difference between me feeling empathetic for my phone and my phone actually feeling sadness that it is low on battery. It is just my human tendency to emotionally connect with things around me. One final note, I urge you all to look up the technological art piece “Can’t Help Myself.” One of the reasons this piece of art is so compelling is because viewers feel bad for the piece of equipment.
On page 4 paragraph 2 Kevin Kelly points out that technology has fans and these fans show their love by collecting and modifying. With this I can agree. While I personally don’t collect and modify pieces of technology like cars, or boats or cameras I am very aware that many people enjoy doing this. I even enjoy watching people modify and customize their cars to align more with their style. In a way it is to make technology more beautiful because beauty is in the eyes of the beholder so customizing something that aligns with how you see beauty is perfect. I also find it interesting what people collect because it ranges so far and people are very serious about it, from cars to salt shakers the collections are endless. However, I do think that collecting is a little useless because you really only need one of something, maybe 2 if it is prone to breaking easily. Otherwise having more than one can seem a little wasteful sometimes but I understand that collecting is more for joy than it is for practicality.
On page 5 paragraph 3 Kelly describes how when he uses technology he sees it as a part of himself. With this I can agree because I always feel like I’m missing something when my phone is not with me. I think that digital technology sometimes feels like a part of me is because I am always using it. There aren’t many instances for when my phone or computer or even apple watch aren’t necessary for my daily functions. I need my phone to keep in contact with friends and family, to be updated on what is happening in to world and even use it as a way to fill in spaces I feel bored. My computer is necessary for any school work because without it I can’t respond to journal prompts, turn in homeworks or even take quizzes. So without technology I might as well be missing a limb like Kelly mentions.
On page 7 paragraph 2 Kelly expands on how we keep technology around because we believe it to be beautiful. On this I have complicated thoughts about the beauty of technology. Kelly seems to believe that technology can rival the beauty of the natural world and that most technology is a kin to art. While I think that some cars, and motorcycles are very nice to look at I don’t think that they will ever beat a waterfall or sunset on the beach. There are just some aspect of the natural world that no man-made technology could ever compare to. But I do believe that some technologies can be beautiful and more art than usefulness. Kelly also mentions how evolved technologies get more beautiful the more history that is behind them. With this I can also see where he is coming from. The more refined technology is and the more it can do I do think it ends up looking much nicer than its original older counterparts. Like computers the sleek, lightweight designs of MacBook are much nicer than the thick, unmovable computers from decades ago.
1. Page 4 paragraph 2
In this passage I do agree that people make relationships with manufactured objects and end up developing deer connections with them. They end up treating them almost like a person with its own feelings rather than a tool. He describes the passion people have for consumption and I believe that he has a deeper meaning of how these inanimate objects become symbols of personal identity and makes them feel like they belong socially. People who are fans of all types of things like cars, cameras, tools, and even more start to obsess over them while collecting and taking more. They also end up making “fan pages” dedicated to said object. The connection people create with the use of the objects digs deeper than just their actual functional use, but helps a person create an identity through them. It depicts human’s desires to find a purpose with said object and create a community with the things created. This portion really shows how deeply technology and objects are deeply woven into our everyday lives, which can shape a person.
2. Page 5 Paragraph 2 and 3
I have a more complicated viewpoint on his portrayal of the internet in this passage. While I do agree, yes, the internet is an expansive space that offers us so many opportunities for exploration and connection, I also see the positive and negative aspects of this “place”. People do get lost in the internet while discovering and exploring new stuff, and where we as people can get lost in the vastness of it, but the use of the internet also has its drawbacks. People can get distracted, overwhelmed, and even being to isolate themselves from others while getting trapped in a different reality. Kelly explains how the web makes him bigger, but the risk of becoming disconnected from reality can begin to narrow people focus into limited areas, that do not allow for a broader perspective. The internet is a very powerful tool for growth since we all use it daily for school, and connections with others, but it can make us distort reality from technology and isolate ourselves if we aren’t careful. The web is filled with endless possibilities, but it also requires the brains to use it correct to make sure we don’t get trapped in it.
3. Page 9 paragraph 2
I have a complicated view on this passage as well. I can agree with Kelly that people’s attraction to technology can come from one’s fixation on the evolution of it, and watching its progress, however, as it becomes from advanced, it becomes more life-like. Technology becoming more life-like can have so many drawbacks, and people can start to form more emotional responses to it, like they do with pets. The beauty of technologies evolution does make sense, and it is so fascinating to see where we first started versus where we are now, but I also feel resistance to the idea that peoples love for the internet is tied to anthropomorphism. While the growth of technology is projecting more human like qualities, I start to worry about the potential danger of being too attached with them. As they begin to advance, losing the ethical concerns and consequences of creating technology like us that are obviously non-human is terrifying. Kellys perspective on the future of technology is intriguing, but it raises so many questions about where the boundary between human and machines should be pushed. There is a very fine line between the over attachment and thrill of technological advances, and admiration over them, and as these new creations are being created, there needs to be a firm balance between the evolution of technology, and the responsibility that comes with it.
I found it interesting how the authors make light of the idea that criticisms work to the advantage of the writer, specifically saying that our writing improves when the critiques are given an explicit hearing to showcase their point. On a similar note, I found it interesting how the authors instruct the readers to “anticipate objections”. The authors stress the importance of including pieces of work into your writing which may contradict your main point, but that conversation you have engaged in with the opposing view will eventually work in favor of your point of view and ultimately strengthen your paper. I found that this idea was perfectly represented in the rather comedic drawing on page 87, which illustrates the common misconception that planting a naysayer is hurtful to your writing but also showcases the reality of the benefits of planting a naysayer by providing a template on how to argue against the misinterpretation of a naysayers opinion. On the next two pages, two different templates are provided, one surrounding the idea of entertaining objections and the other surrounding naming your naysayers. I found these templates to be extremely beneficial as objections are a hard topic to talk about in writing, especially in a way that will improve your writing. Furthermore, I feel as though the template on naming the naysayers is one that I will incorporate into my writings. This has been a struggle for me even including sources that support my writing so I think that a source that argues my point will be even harder to introduce to use properly, so I feel as though this template will prove to make dividends in my writing. Where is the best point to introduce the opposing view? Before or after your “main point”
Pg. 6, Para. 3. Complicated. “Technology does not want to remain utilitarian. It wants to become art, to be beautiful and ‘useless’.” The idea of technology wanting to express an art is, I believe, true. Humans inherently have been using technology as a way to create art, and as technology continues to fuel our imagination, it also changes the kind of art we create. As industrialization era rocked the post-Rennaissance world, completely changing the way people saw the world. In modern times, artists have evolved to create brutalist drawings, and for the idea of the “dystopia” to be a commonly envisioned future in the art world, with twirling pipes, high neon-soaked towers, and a neo-punk aesthetic. However, saying that, technology has never been “useless”. It has been an invention that has helped to further our own intellectual endeavors, create monetary value, destroy the natural world, and to better the lives of humans. So, yes, technology does seem to be pushing the boundaries of what art can truly be, but creating technology that is inherently “useless” undermines the actual creation of the technology in the first place.
Pg. 9, Para. 2. Agree. “‘We make ourselves stupid in order to make computers seem smart. I don’t worry about computers getting intelligent, I worry about humans getting dumber.’” This is something that can be seen happening right now, with people all around us. As technology continues to replace the need to understand ideas and to learn about the world around us, humans continually become reliant on technology to remain informed and as a replacement for actually acquiring wisdom about the world. This is once again one of the ideas of the argument against technology, “Wisdom vs. Knowledge”. Technology allows anyone, anywhere to learn about whatever facts they want with just the touch of a few buttons. But if you asked that person the effects of that fact on the greater world, they would have a hard time answering your question. Humans have increasingly used technology as a retreat from the need to experience the real world, which in turn, reduces our ability to understand the world around us.
Pg. 9, Para. 4. Disagree. “I am willing to be in the not-too-distant future the magnificence of certain patches of technium will rival the splendor of the natural world.” This may seem like more of an opinion, but this is honestly a very worrying string of thought to hear from anyone. This idea completely ignores the devastating impacts on our lives a world dominated by technological landscapes would have. If, for instance, we imagine a world covered in technological landmarks, we will have destroyed much of the natural world. Plants, animals, all other life would cease to exist. This insane lust for technology could, quite literally, lead to the end of an inhabitable world, as we consume more and more of our natural resources to create our new world. This excerpt from Kevin Kell’s piece seems to suggest that there is no consideration for the destructive nature such a “not-too-distant future” could cause to our future generations. Rather than keep on these rose-colored glasses of hailing technology as if it were a new god or religion, perhaps learning how to regulate it and minimize its impact to our far more beautiful, complex, and amazing natural world, perhaps the stigma around technology would go away.
Page 4 paragraph 2
I agree.Kelly mentions that technology has fans, and these fans show their appreciation by collecting and modifying it.I can definitely agree with this. I always see people that are truly passionate about collecting cars, bikes, boats, etc. Modifying them to the style they want. Enjoying the process of rebuilding their collections. Which I find entertaining myself.In a way, it’s about making technology more beautiful by customizing something to fit your vision of beauty. Everyone has their own opinion on a collection but I never really found the joy of having more then 2-3 items of the same thing just because after a while you just don’t really know what to do with it anymore.
Page 5 paragraph 4
I agree. The internet has truly transformed the way we go about our daily lives, making tasks faster and more convenient which makes technology a very important source in our lives. I cant imagine completing simple things like research or even basic errands without it. Simple things like when I need to find information quickly or get an answer to a question, the internet is always there, providing instant access to the smartest sources. Without it, I would have to rely on slower methods like visiting libraries or asking around for help. The ease of having so much at my fingertips makes everything feel more manageable, and it’s something I really value in today’s world.
Page 1 paragraph 1
Complicated. It’s true that teenagers are very attached and involved in their phones, some can’t even go a day without it. I’ve seen a lot of people struggle with this but some people know how to set limits on themselves. It’s such a new issue, and with how addictive screens can be, it’s hard for both parents and teens to figure it out, which phone habits can affect their kids, and so can their friends. Back in the day I didn’t understand why they needed all that access to the internet, but now that I’m older, I get how it can feel necessary. I even find myself getting the latest tech now. The opening really made me think about how much technology has changed things for everyone.
Page 6, paragraph 2. I disagree. I believe that technology doesn’t want to become art. Technology is far too useful to become art, and all of the examples that Kelley provides of technology existing as art have one major flaw: the loss of usefulness. For instance, the Bastolene cars, sure they are still cars and will still get you from point A to point B, but they are also art. They are made for looks and most likely won’t get you where you want to go in the way a car made for transport would. Kelly even mentioned seeing the cars being transported on flatbeds, they couldn’t even do what they were made to do, which is to drive. Some old dude was talking to me on a ski lift because I was bummed that I fell nearly destroyed my skis, he said “Well you have to understand, they’re tools not jewels. They are here to do a job, not to look pretty.” The same thing goes for technology; as soon as it crosses that line and becomes art, it loses its functionality because it becomes coveted, something that shouldn’t be touched and meddled with but instead looked at, admired, and left alone.
Page 9, paragraph 1. I agree. I, too, believe that we have fallen so deeply in love with technology that we are completely blind to the damage it has already done and most likely will continue to do in the future. After all of the movies we’ve made about how this could go so wrong and all of the stuff we thought was just a science fiction fantasy. It’s all starting to feel less and less like a fantasy, all these things we warned ourselves not to do, that are happening all because we are so incredibly blinded by our love of our creation that we never stop to think of the consequences of our rampagey search for advancement and knowledge. “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.” — Dr. Ian Malcolm
Page one, paragraph 1
Complicated. I think this opening is very weird and stupid. This whole opening is strange to me when it is said that the girl was “faint, nauseous, and so ill she couldn’t get out of bed.” I found this to be a super portrayal because I feel that people do not act like this and that he is just taking out one case and saying that this happens to everyone. This paragraph is also just not helpful to the overall theme of the article. The whole issue revolving technology in phones and how it is degrading our minds is so new that it is difficult to say whether this take on it is accurate or not. I feel that he is very aggressive in his words but that may very well be how they feel but there just isn’t enough research on the topic to say whether it is good or bad.
Page 5 paragraph 4
Agree. I feel like the sentiment made in this paragraph about how technology Is truly running our world is very accurate. Technology is everywhere in our lives and will never not be in our lives. This does not mean that it is inherently some bad thing that we have it everywhere, it just means that we must learn to live in harmony with it rather than try and destroy it and say that it is bad. Technology is like something that needs to be carefully looked after rather than punished for doing nothing except existing. Technology has the ability to bring people together from all around the world and can do extremely great things if in the right hands.
Page 4 paragraph 2
Complicated. I feel that it is very beneficial to ones psychological self if they have a very avid hobby they like to do or if they have something fun they do in their spare time. This, just like all things we do as people, can become bad if not unchecked after a while. If someone is an avid member of a certain hobby, then they might wind up spending to much of their time doing that hobby and not spending time with loved ones and friends. These people can also get to a point where they spend all their money on that hobby. This can be related back to phones because of someone with a phone does all these things, then they will have the same fallout as people with other hobbies and it will not be good.
Page 4 paragraph 1. This paragraph has a powerful background that it talks about. It really ties in the idea of how we as humans have come to be one of creation, destruction, and realization of the situation around us. We have been able to develop knowledge about technology that only we are able to use. The dams it talks about have given us nearly unlimited power in the region which they were built, this provides the opportunity for millions to grow, learn, interact, and be a part of fruitful society. Yet, we so often over look at what the dam also represents, death. The millions of migrating fish in each river so often are unable to return to spawn each year. Was this an initial intention? Who knows. Was it our drive for developing technologies that we were so blindsided and forgot about how our environment is also affected. Just like the river, our minds have been artificially redesigned.
Page 5 paragraph 2. I am also one of them, someone who loves the internet. I agree that the internet still has some uncharted territory. Even though it is in constant evolution over the last 25 years or so, there are bit of the internet that are still very niche and only suffice a few peoples needs. The other 99% of the internet is a limitless spiderweb of thoughts, ideas, actions, and images that we have created to document our own evolution since its creation. We have uploaded our views on what the world will look like and what we have come to know from our past. Literally blanketing our entire existence onto an intangible database, one which everyone in the world can have access to, but yet can’t actually own. Somehow it has become a part of us, maybe not physically but most certainly mentally, and, I would say pretty damn close to spiritually. Our existence today would not be the same if the internet didn’t exist.
Page 7 paragraph 2. I agree with this idea of evolution is intertwined with beauty. I also agree that with time comes aging, both for the good and for the bad. The paragraph talks about how London’s original versions were scarce, rough, eye sores, and over the years as the city councilmen developed new techniques and new areas were built, the city began to show it true colors of the time. Heights of buildings increased, the size of communal areas doubled, the city started running out of room. This is what happens when success begins to show. The success of the city leans heavily on the success of its people. If the people cannot continuously evolve, then how can the city grow in parallel. I’ve never been to London myself, only in pictures and videos, but it is truly magnificent. At least the parts they want us to see. There are most certainly areas that will be rough, not every city can be perfect. Even the freshest of apples can have bruises when they fall. This revolves back to that idea that even though it may but highly evolved, it might not be the most beautiful, all of the time.
Page 5 Paragraph 2
I agree with Kelley’s idea of the internet as an evolving space with endless possibilities for learning and connection. It is a platform for culture, innovation, and understanding. The idea of “getting lost in the web” shows the interest of discovery where one can find new perspectives and gain new knowledge. The comparison to wilderness shows us the complex and unpredictable internet’s challenges. While navigating the digital world and the opportunities we have, we also face issues of privacy and misinformation. Kelley’s vision makes us appreciate the power and approach of the internet. It gives us appreciation and curiosity and helps us recognize its impact on us and our society. Kelley’s idea resonates with many who view the internet as more than a tool for communication or information sources. The internet can be a “place” as well as a network. It has shaped human experiences and interactions in a good and bad way. The internet has a capacity to explore creativity like a physical environment.
Page 9 Paragraph 1
Kelley’s idea of sharing Turkle’s concerns about our attachment to technology is interesting. Turkles highlights the ease with which humans being able to develop affection for technology that has barely minimal human characteristics. Having this attachment can lead us to use these machines as if they deserve our love and care which impacts our interactions with real humans. I agree with Turkle’s worries about the consequences of technophilia. The idea that we might diminish our humanity to match the “humanity” in technology concerns me as well. Lanier’s point is about humans making themselves stupid so that computers seem smart. Our efforts to rely on machines might compromise our cognitive abilities and critical thinking skills. Turkle’s perspective encourages a more cautious approach to how we use and interact with technology. We should be reminded to maintain our human qualities and intelligence, making sure our love for machines doesn’t affect our life or humanity.
Page 5 Paragraph 3
I agree with the view from Kelley that connecting us to a wider world of information can make us feel “bigger” or more enriched. Her idea about the internet as an expansive and transformative space resonates with the view of digital connectivity in modern life. Being part of this network that is so fast can change one’s sense of self and underscore the impact technology has on our identity and daily experiences. The connectivity allows for greater access to knowledge, which can broaden our understanding and personal growth. The feeling of being “amputated” when disconnected shows the dependency we have for technology. It reminds us of the balance needed between embracing technological advancement and keeping our ability to function independently without the consistent digital world. Kelley’s vision encourages us to appreciate the benefits of digital connectivity while being mindful of its influence on our humanity and daily life. We need to harness the power of the internet to help benefit our lives while staying aware of what it does to us with harm.
12 thoughts on “JOURNAL # 17”
Page 5 paragraph 4. I agree with this sentiment. The internet has made itself such an important part of everyday life that I would not be able to complete all of my daily tasks without it. As I complete this assignment I am using the internet. There were many words that I had to look up while reading this essay, and I would not have been able to have as solid of an understanding of this article if I didn’t have the internet at my disposal. Sure, I could have gone to the library and checked out a dictionary in order to look up the words I needed clarification on, but using the internet saved me so much time that I was able to finish this assignment. Since the internet has made itself so important in our everyday lives, I definitely feel a sense of gratitude for the ease and comfort it brings to my life, as opposed to much more time consuming and complicated methods of completing tasks.
Page nine, paragraph 2. I disagree with this sentiment. I think this behavior stems from the over-empathy of human beings in general. There are people who feel guilty for moving stuffed animals off of their beds because they think it will hurt their feelings. There are computers that could be so highly advanced, but people wouldn’t give it a second thought if they “hurt” the computer by spilling their drink on it. Humans have an innate urge to feel bad for other living things, so when you give a robot the ability to mimic living traits, then they will, on some level, trigger this empathy. Evolution has nothing to do with it, as this same empathy can be triggered by less evolved creatures. The more human-like something is, the more likely people are to have an emotional response to it. While I understand where the author is coming from, I think that he is setting up a false equivalency between evolution and humans in the context of why humans like more advanced technology
Page 6 paragraph 4: I agree with this idea that Kelly presents. It’s an interesting thought to ponder, how many items we would “lose” if we got rid of the main one, the example he brought was a stove, in which we would lose so many now useless items without it. I very much agree with the idea that manufacturing possibilities are overrunning the planet, and human needs are not expanding at this rate. The amount of useless(ish) items I’ve collected, even at my age, is embarrassing. Especially with platforms such as Shein, Temu, even Amazon, where you can purchase mass amounts of technologies made to make your life easier, but really just clogging up your mental capacity. Having to downsize for college is now a struggle for many, having to bring only the truly useful items with you, having limited space, can be challenging, especially that people form attachments to these useless technologies.
Page 5 paragraph 2: I agree with the idea that Kelly presents, which is technically Turkle’s idea that he includes in his writing. Many of us have our niche, something that makes us slightly unique, builds character, etc. I like the words “springboard for identity.” Not only does it strengthen our own health, mentally and physically, it also brings us closer to others when we relate or debate. Thus more socially aware, etc. The way I interpreted this writing is that we now all have the exact same love; screens/social media. Of course there are many platforms online to relate and debate, but it leaves out the social/physical aspect of it. Someone having aspirations for an online game, eyes 24/7 glued to a screen, and no social interaction, is very different from an athlete with teammates, etc. There is a possibility to have both in a healthy way, the point is that online platforms have drastically taken over. And is that unhealthy? Kelly uses the examples of doctors, writers, dispatcher, and programmers having a love that causes reflection and thinking
Page 1 paragraph 1: I think that this opener is complicated. I agree that teenagers have this severe attachment to phones, seeing it as a branch of themselves that they can not live or be anything without. It is true that many struggle with this. The problem is that parents don’t know how to handle it, or prevent it. Since it’s so new and complicated in ways, this dependency on drug like screens, parents and teenagers alike can’t help themselves. Parents have an influence on their children, their own attachment to screens can have an influence on their behavior. So can other students. I remember being in early middle school, my friends had the latest phones and technology(iphone 8, X, etc) when I was stuck with an ipod. I didn’t understand why they would need all of that access so young, but now it’s more present. Of course now that I’m older and sort of need that technology now, I find myself reaching for the newest products. The opening paragraph overall did its jobs, capturing the reader’s attention and creating thought/reflection.
1. Page 5, paragraph 3
Complicated – I agree with Kelly in the sense that I also view the online world as a “wilderness” that is easy to get lost in, however I feel as though Kelly fails to highlight the scary and isolating sides of the web. My appreciation and love for the online realm could stem from the fact that I have grown up with constant access to technology and its intricacies. I feel as though I can navigate it quite effectively and due to this competence, exploring the online world seems limitless and fun. I find myself frequently going down rabbit holes when I’m online. I enter it without a purpose and see what I can learn, find, and enjoy the entertainment this process evokes. However, I also acknowledge that the online world is also commonly used to provoke fear, spread hate, stimulate polarization, and has the ability to make one feel isolated. This side of online can not be glossed over and users must be cautioned of it before entering it. The online world is a wilderness, however it is also important to remember a wilderness is filled with predators, poisonous plants, and a plethora of other dangers that the explorer must be aware of and prepared for.
2. Page 6, paragraph 4
Agree – I agree and am fascinated by this idea of technologies existing for the sole purpose to serve other technologies. After reading this essay, I became hyperaware of this phenomenon all around me. It’s as if I own several technological ecosystems. Let’s take my phone for example. I have the physical device that is filled with my whole online identity. Yet, I also have a phone case and a glass screen protector to protect this device. In addition, I have multiple chargers with the specific adaptor for my model of iPhone. These accessory items are pieces of technology themselves, however they were created to ensure that my phone can perform as efficiently as possible. In addition, I find it interesting how Kelly states that these systems of interconnected technologies serving each other are incredibly pleasing to humans and is an aspect of this idea of technophilic. Humans love technology not only due to the benefits it provides for them, but also for the aesthetic and existence value of it.
3. Page 10, concluding sentence
Disagree – To conclude this essay Kelly writes, “…technology wants to be loved” (10). I disagree with this statement as I feel there is a clear distinction between humans manifesting human-like characteristics on technology and actually denoting that technology exhibits human emotions, such as love or a desire for it. I do acknowledge that technology evolves to get strangely human-like and we as people are gravitated and entranced by this process. When I contemplate this idea, my mind immediately goes to technologies such as Siri and generative AI. Apple is constantly trying to enhance Siri into responding and sounding more human-like. We can even go on our settings and change its accent to whatever we please. On a separate but similar note, AI applications like ChatGPT are known for their ability to think and act very humanly. I find it so incredibly interesting that we feel emotions towards technology and treat it as if it can possess emotions on its own. For example, I hate to admit that I have felt bad for my devices when they are going to die. I have an emotional response to it being so dwindled of power that that it physically must shut off. However, I really feel there is a difference between me feeling empathetic for my phone and my phone actually feeling sadness that it is low on battery. It is just my human tendency to emotionally connect with things around me. One final note, I urge you all to look up the technological art piece “Can’t Help Myself.” One of the reasons this piece of art is so compelling is because viewers feel bad for the piece of equipment.
On page 4 paragraph 2 Kevin Kelly points out that technology has fans and these fans show their love by collecting and modifying. With this I can agree. While I personally don’t collect and modify pieces of technology like cars, or boats or cameras I am very aware that many people enjoy doing this. I even enjoy watching people modify and customize their cars to align more with their style. In a way it is to make technology more beautiful because beauty is in the eyes of the beholder so customizing something that aligns with how you see beauty is perfect. I also find it interesting what people collect because it ranges so far and people are very serious about it, from cars to salt shakers the collections are endless. However, I do think that collecting is a little useless because you really only need one of something, maybe 2 if it is prone to breaking easily. Otherwise having more than one can seem a little wasteful sometimes but I understand that collecting is more for joy than it is for practicality.
On page 5 paragraph 3 Kelly describes how when he uses technology he sees it as a part of himself. With this I can agree because I always feel like I’m missing something when my phone is not with me. I think that digital technology sometimes feels like a part of me is because I am always using it. There aren’t many instances for when my phone or computer or even apple watch aren’t necessary for my daily functions. I need my phone to keep in contact with friends and family, to be updated on what is happening in to world and even use it as a way to fill in spaces I feel bored. My computer is necessary for any school work because without it I can’t respond to journal prompts, turn in homeworks or even take quizzes. So without technology I might as well be missing a limb like Kelly mentions.
On page 7 paragraph 2 Kelly expands on how we keep technology around because we believe it to be beautiful. On this I have complicated thoughts about the beauty of technology. Kelly seems to believe that technology can rival the beauty of the natural world and that most technology is a kin to art. While I think that some cars, and motorcycles are very nice to look at I don’t think that they will ever beat a waterfall or sunset on the beach. There are just some aspect of the natural world that no man-made technology could ever compare to. But I do believe that some technologies can be beautiful and more art than usefulness. Kelly also mentions how evolved technologies get more beautiful the more history that is behind them. With this I can also see where he is coming from. The more refined technology is and the more it can do I do think it ends up looking much nicer than its original older counterparts. Like computers the sleek, lightweight designs of MacBook are much nicer than the thick, unmovable computers from decades ago.
1. Page 4 paragraph 2
In this passage I do agree that people make relationships with manufactured objects and end up developing deer connections with them. They end up treating them almost like a person with its own feelings rather than a tool. He describes the passion people have for consumption and I believe that he has a deeper meaning of how these inanimate objects become symbols of personal identity and makes them feel like they belong socially. People who are fans of all types of things like cars, cameras, tools, and even more start to obsess over them while collecting and taking more. They also end up making “fan pages” dedicated to said object. The connection people create with the use of the objects digs deeper than just their actual functional use, but helps a person create an identity through them. It depicts human’s desires to find a purpose with said object and create a community with the things created. This portion really shows how deeply technology and objects are deeply woven into our everyday lives, which can shape a person.
2. Page 5 Paragraph 2 and 3
I have a more complicated viewpoint on his portrayal of the internet in this passage. While I do agree, yes, the internet is an expansive space that offers us so many opportunities for exploration and connection, I also see the positive and negative aspects of this “place”. People do get lost in the internet while discovering and exploring new stuff, and where we as people can get lost in the vastness of it, but the use of the internet also has its drawbacks. People can get distracted, overwhelmed, and even being to isolate themselves from others while getting trapped in a different reality. Kelly explains how the web makes him bigger, but the risk of becoming disconnected from reality can begin to narrow people focus into limited areas, that do not allow for a broader perspective. The internet is a very powerful tool for growth since we all use it daily for school, and connections with others, but it can make us distort reality from technology and isolate ourselves if we aren’t careful. The web is filled with endless possibilities, but it also requires the brains to use it correct to make sure we don’t get trapped in it.
3. Page 9 paragraph 2
I have a complicated view on this passage as well. I can agree with Kelly that people’s attraction to technology can come from one’s fixation on the evolution of it, and watching its progress, however, as it becomes from advanced, it becomes more life-like. Technology becoming more life-like can have so many drawbacks, and people can start to form more emotional responses to it, like they do with pets. The beauty of technologies evolution does make sense, and it is so fascinating to see where we first started versus where we are now, but I also feel resistance to the idea that peoples love for the internet is tied to anthropomorphism. While the growth of technology is projecting more human like qualities, I start to worry about the potential danger of being too attached with them. As they begin to advance, losing the ethical concerns and consequences of creating technology like us that are obviously non-human is terrifying. Kellys perspective on the future of technology is intriguing, but it raises so many questions about where the boundary between human and machines should be pushed. There is a very fine line between the over attachment and thrill of technological advances, and admiration over them, and as these new creations are being created, there needs to be a firm balance between the evolution of technology, and the responsibility that comes with it.
I found it interesting how the authors make light of the idea that criticisms work to the advantage of the writer, specifically saying that our writing improves when the critiques are given an explicit hearing to showcase their point. On a similar note, I found it interesting how the authors instruct the readers to “anticipate objections”. The authors stress the importance of including pieces of work into your writing which may contradict your main point, but that conversation you have engaged in with the opposing view will eventually work in favor of your point of view and ultimately strengthen your paper. I found that this idea was perfectly represented in the rather comedic drawing on page 87, which illustrates the common misconception that planting a naysayer is hurtful to your writing but also showcases the reality of the benefits of planting a naysayer by providing a template on how to argue against the misinterpretation of a naysayers opinion. On the next two pages, two different templates are provided, one surrounding the idea of entertaining objections and the other surrounding naming your naysayers. I found these templates to be extremely beneficial as objections are a hard topic to talk about in writing, especially in a way that will improve your writing. Furthermore, I feel as though the template on naming the naysayers is one that I will incorporate into my writings. This has been a struggle for me even including sources that support my writing so I think that a source that argues my point will be even harder to introduce to use properly, so I feel as though this template will prove to make dividends in my writing. Where is the best point to introduce the opposing view? Before or after your “main point”
Pg. 6, Para. 3. Complicated. “Technology does not want to remain utilitarian. It wants to become art, to be beautiful and ‘useless’.” The idea of technology wanting to express an art is, I believe, true. Humans inherently have been using technology as a way to create art, and as technology continues to fuel our imagination, it also changes the kind of art we create. As industrialization era rocked the post-Rennaissance world, completely changing the way people saw the world. In modern times, artists have evolved to create brutalist drawings, and for the idea of the “dystopia” to be a commonly envisioned future in the art world, with twirling pipes, high neon-soaked towers, and a neo-punk aesthetic. However, saying that, technology has never been “useless”. It has been an invention that has helped to further our own intellectual endeavors, create monetary value, destroy the natural world, and to better the lives of humans. So, yes, technology does seem to be pushing the boundaries of what art can truly be, but creating technology that is inherently “useless” undermines the actual creation of the technology in the first place.
Pg. 9, Para. 2. Agree. “‘We make ourselves stupid in order to make computers seem smart. I don’t worry about computers getting intelligent, I worry about humans getting dumber.’” This is something that can be seen happening right now, with people all around us. As technology continues to replace the need to understand ideas and to learn about the world around us, humans continually become reliant on technology to remain informed and as a replacement for actually acquiring wisdom about the world. This is once again one of the ideas of the argument against technology, “Wisdom vs. Knowledge”. Technology allows anyone, anywhere to learn about whatever facts they want with just the touch of a few buttons. But if you asked that person the effects of that fact on the greater world, they would have a hard time answering your question. Humans have increasingly used technology as a retreat from the need to experience the real world, which in turn, reduces our ability to understand the world around us.
Pg. 9, Para. 4. Disagree. “I am willing to be in the not-too-distant future the magnificence of certain patches of technium will rival the splendor of the natural world.” This may seem like more of an opinion, but this is honestly a very worrying string of thought to hear from anyone. This idea completely ignores the devastating impacts on our lives a world dominated by technological landscapes would have. If, for instance, we imagine a world covered in technological landmarks, we will have destroyed much of the natural world. Plants, animals, all other life would cease to exist. This insane lust for technology could, quite literally, lead to the end of an inhabitable world, as we consume more and more of our natural resources to create our new world. This excerpt from Kevin Kell’s piece seems to suggest that there is no consideration for the destructive nature such a “not-too-distant future” could cause to our future generations. Rather than keep on these rose-colored glasses of hailing technology as if it were a new god or religion, perhaps learning how to regulate it and minimize its impact to our far more beautiful, complex, and amazing natural world, perhaps the stigma around technology would go away.
Page 4 paragraph 2
I agree.Kelly mentions that technology has fans, and these fans show their appreciation by collecting and modifying it.I can definitely agree with this. I always see people that are truly passionate about collecting cars, bikes, boats, etc. Modifying them to the style they want. Enjoying the process of rebuilding their collections. Which I find entertaining myself.In a way, it’s about making technology more beautiful by customizing something to fit your vision of beauty. Everyone has their own opinion on a collection but I never really found the joy of having more then 2-3 items of the same thing just because after a while you just don’t really know what to do with it anymore.
Page 5 paragraph 4
I agree. The internet has truly transformed the way we go about our daily lives, making tasks faster and more convenient which makes technology a very important source in our lives. I cant imagine completing simple things like research or even basic errands without it. Simple things like when I need to find information quickly or get an answer to a question, the internet is always there, providing instant access to the smartest sources. Without it, I would have to rely on slower methods like visiting libraries or asking around for help. The ease of having so much at my fingertips makes everything feel more manageable, and it’s something I really value in today’s world.
Page 1 paragraph 1
Complicated. It’s true that teenagers are very attached and involved in their phones, some can’t even go a day without it. I’ve seen a lot of people struggle with this but some people know how to set limits on themselves. It’s such a new issue, and with how addictive screens can be, it’s hard for both parents and teens to figure it out, which phone habits can affect their kids, and so can their friends. Back in the day I didn’t understand why they needed all that access to the internet, but now that I’m older, I get how it can feel necessary. I even find myself getting the latest tech now. The opening really made me think about how much technology has changed things for everyone.
Page 6, paragraph 2. I disagree. I believe that technology doesn’t want to become art. Technology is far too useful to become art, and all of the examples that Kelley provides of technology existing as art have one major flaw: the loss of usefulness. For instance, the Bastolene cars, sure they are still cars and will still get you from point A to point B, but they are also art. They are made for looks and most likely won’t get you where you want to go in the way a car made for transport would. Kelly even mentioned seeing the cars being transported on flatbeds, they couldn’t even do what they were made to do, which is to drive. Some old dude was talking to me on a ski lift because I was bummed that I fell nearly destroyed my skis, he said “Well you have to understand, they’re tools not jewels. They are here to do a job, not to look pretty.” The same thing goes for technology; as soon as it crosses that line and becomes art, it loses its functionality because it becomes coveted, something that shouldn’t be touched and meddled with but instead looked at, admired, and left alone.
Page 9, paragraph 1. I agree. I, too, believe that we have fallen so deeply in love with technology that we are completely blind to the damage it has already done and most likely will continue to do in the future. After all of the movies we’ve made about how this could go so wrong and all of the stuff we thought was just a science fiction fantasy. It’s all starting to feel less and less like a fantasy, all these things we warned ourselves not to do, that are happening all because we are so incredibly blinded by our love of our creation that we never stop to think of the consequences of our rampagey search for advancement and knowledge. “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.” — Dr. Ian Malcolm
Page one, paragraph 1
Complicated. I think this opening is very weird and stupid. This whole opening is strange to me when it is said that the girl was “faint, nauseous, and so ill she couldn’t get out of bed.” I found this to be a super portrayal because I feel that people do not act like this and that he is just taking out one case and saying that this happens to everyone. This paragraph is also just not helpful to the overall theme of the article. The whole issue revolving technology in phones and how it is degrading our minds is so new that it is difficult to say whether this take on it is accurate or not. I feel that he is very aggressive in his words but that may very well be how they feel but there just isn’t enough research on the topic to say whether it is good or bad.
Page 5 paragraph 4
Agree. I feel like the sentiment made in this paragraph about how technology Is truly running our world is very accurate. Technology is everywhere in our lives and will never not be in our lives. This does not mean that it is inherently some bad thing that we have it everywhere, it just means that we must learn to live in harmony with it rather than try and destroy it and say that it is bad. Technology is like something that needs to be carefully looked after rather than punished for doing nothing except existing. Technology has the ability to bring people together from all around the world and can do extremely great things if in the right hands.
Page 4 paragraph 2
Complicated. I feel that it is very beneficial to ones psychological self if they have a very avid hobby they like to do or if they have something fun they do in their spare time. This, just like all things we do as people, can become bad if not unchecked after a while. If someone is an avid member of a certain hobby, then they might wind up spending to much of their time doing that hobby and not spending time with loved ones and friends. These people can also get to a point where they spend all their money on that hobby. This can be related back to phones because of someone with a phone does all these things, then they will have the same fallout as people with other hobbies and it will not be good.
Page 4 paragraph 1. This paragraph has a powerful background that it talks about. It really ties in the idea of how we as humans have come to be one of creation, destruction, and realization of the situation around us. We have been able to develop knowledge about technology that only we are able to use. The dams it talks about have given us nearly unlimited power in the region which they were built, this provides the opportunity for millions to grow, learn, interact, and be a part of fruitful society. Yet, we so often over look at what the dam also represents, death. The millions of migrating fish in each river so often are unable to return to spawn each year. Was this an initial intention? Who knows. Was it our drive for developing technologies that we were so blindsided and forgot about how our environment is also affected. Just like the river, our minds have been artificially redesigned.
Page 5 paragraph 2. I am also one of them, someone who loves the internet. I agree that the internet still has some uncharted territory. Even though it is in constant evolution over the last 25 years or so, there are bit of the internet that are still very niche and only suffice a few peoples needs. The other 99% of the internet is a limitless spiderweb of thoughts, ideas, actions, and images that we have created to document our own evolution since its creation. We have uploaded our views on what the world will look like and what we have come to know from our past. Literally blanketing our entire existence onto an intangible database, one which everyone in the world can have access to, but yet can’t actually own. Somehow it has become a part of us, maybe not physically but most certainly mentally, and, I would say pretty damn close to spiritually. Our existence today would not be the same if the internet didn’t exist.
Page 7 paragraph 2. I agree with this idea of evolution is intertwined with beauty. I also agree that with time comes aging, both for the good and for the bad. The paragraph talks about how London’s original versions were scarce, rough, eye sores, and over the years as the city councilmen developed new techniques and new areas were built, the city began to show it true colors of the time. Heights of buildings increased, the size of communal areas doubled, the city started running out of room. This is what happens when success begins to show. The success of the city leans heavily on the success of its people. If the people cannot continuously evolve, then how can the city grow in parallel. I’ve never been to London myself, only in pictures and videos, but it is truly magnificent. At least the parts they want us to see. There are most certainly areas that will be rough, not every city can be perfect. Even the freshest of apples can have bruises when they fall. This revolves back to that idea that even though it may but highly evolved, it might not be the most beautiful, all of the time.
Page 5 Paragraph 2
I agree with Kelley’s idea of the internet as an evolving space with endless possibilities for learning and connection. It is a platform for culture, innovation, and understanding. The idea of “getting lost in the web” shows the interest of discovery where one can find new perspectives and gain new knowledge. The comparison to wilderness shows us the complex and unpredictable internet’s challenges. While navigating the digital world and the opportunities we have, we also face issues of privacy and misinformation. Kelley’s vision makes us appreciate the power and approach of the internet. It gives us appreciation and curiosity and helps us recognize its impact on us and our society. Kelley’s idea resonates with many who view the internet as more than a tool for communication or information sources. The internet can be a “place” as well as a network. It has shaped human experiences and interactions in a good and bad way. The internet has a capacity to explore creativity like a physical environment.
Page 9 Paragraph 1
Kelley’s idea of sharing Turkle’s concerns about our attachment to technology is interesting. Turkles highlights the ease with which humans being able to develop affection for technology that has barely minimal human characteristics. Having this attachment can lead us to use these machines as if they deserve our love and care which impacts our interactions with real humans. I agree with Turkle’s worries about the consequences of technophilia. The idea that we might diminish our humanity to match the “humanity” in technology concerns me as well. Lanier’s point is about humans making themselves stupid so that computers seem smart. Our efforts to rely on machines might compromise our cognitive abilities and critical thinking skills. Turkle’s perspective encourages a more cautious approach to how we use and interact with technology. We should be reminded to maintain our human qualities and intelligence, making sure our love for machines doesn’t affect our life or humanity.
Page 5 Paragraph 3
I agree with the view from Kelley that connecting us to a wider world of information can make us feel “bigger” or more enriched. Her idea about the internet as an expansive and transformative space resonates with the view of digital connectivity in modern life. Being part of this network that is so fast can change one’s sense of self and underscore the impact technology has on our identity and daily experiences. The connectivity allows for greater access to knowledge, which can broaden our understanding and personal growth. The feeling of being “amputated” when disconnected shows the dependency we have for technology. It reminds us of the balance needed between embracing technological advancement and keeping our ability to function independently without the consistent digital world. Kelley’s vision encourages us to appreciate the benefits of digital connectivity while being mindful of its influence on our humanity and daily life. We need to harness the power of the internet to help benefit our lives while staying aware of what it does to us with harm.